In the Weekly Republican Address, Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli speaks about the failure of the Obamacare rollout earlier this month, but notes that the President’s health care law “was fundamentally broken even before it started.” Cuccinelli, the first attorney general in America to challenge the law in federal court, says, “President Obama’s ideas are deeply flawed and the implementation of this law has been a national embarrassment. Let me be plain, the law that carries the President’s name is the hallmark of a reckless federal bureaucracy that has lost its way.” Cuccinelli says, “Everywhere you look, there’s more evidence that ObamaCare was fundamentally broken even before it started. And while our citizens bear the brunt of the law, it seems like big corporations and special interests have gotten exempted. Even Members of Congress are getting preferential treatment, yet everyday Virginians, of whom I am privileged to count myself, are paying the costs and experiencing diminished freedoms.” He says there are solutions claiming,
“We can do better. We need to provide flexibility and choice within our health care system. Our citizens shouldn’t be forced to choose insurance providers and doctors who’ve been preselected by government bureaucrats. We need to open up the insurance market and allow cross state purchase of insurance to drive competition and lower premiums.
“Physicians are fleeing Medicaid because they’re paid so little and have to spend more time completing regulatory paperwork, time they would rather spend treating their patients. Our citizens should be able to choose the health care providers who they believe will provide the best care for their needs, and we shouldn’t have to make our healthcare decisions with 16,000 IRS agents looming as the ObamaCare enforcers.
“Most importantly, we need to reverse the perverse incentives that have raised the cost of insurance premiums and have forced employers to drop health care benefits and full-time jobs in order to stay in business.
“Our health care system should be transparent at all levels and provide pricing to inform and empower American families.
“We should support market based solutions for health care reform and empower patients free of government control. More and more government in health care has proven to make it worse, not better! America needs to go the other way, trusting our people and our doctors to work out a system that’s best for healthcare, not marching to the senseless beat of some far off government drum.
“If the politicians who gave us this train wreck expect us to live by this law, then the same law without special exemptions should apply to Congress. Is that really too much to ask?
In this week’s address, President Obama said that now that the Federal government is reopened and the threat of default is lifted from the economy, there are three places Washington can take action to serve the American people. First, it’s time for a balanced, responsible approach to the budget that grows the economy and shrinks our long term deficits. Second, we must fix our broken immigration system. And finally, Congress should pass a farm bill to give rural communities the opportunity to grow. The President said it’s time to put aside politics and work on behalf of the American people and the country we love.
Belinda Bee (Co-Organizer) of the 2 Million Bikers to D.C. Ride joins Fox & Friends to explain to Brian Kilmeade the reasons behind the permit denial for the event. The Parks service denied them permits to ride today, but they are coming anyway. Let the rubber hit the roads, and thank you bikers for standing up for Americans.
Here is one group leaving Richmond Virginia at 7 am this morning.
President Obama needs your help starting World War III! Find out how you can help!
Written by John Loos
Staring Brianna Baker, Neal Dandade, Greg Ott and Niccole Thurman.
Directed and Produced by Jeph Porter | Sound Jason Culver | Production Coordinator Joel Labahn | Hair/Makeup Chloe Hector
During his interview with CBS News Scott Pelley, President Obama said he understands he doesn’t have the backing of the people on his plans for Syria.
Scott Pelley: Mr. President, the administration has described evidence to the American people and the world but it hasn’t shown evidence. And I wonder at this point, what are you willing to show? What are we going to see in terms of the evidence that you say we have?
President Obama: Well, keep in mind what we’ve done is we have provided unclassified evidence. But members of Congress are getting a whole slew of classified briefings. And they’re seeing very directly exactly what we have. Keep in mind, Scott, that the– this is not a problem I’m looking for. I’m not looking for an excuse to engage in military action.
And I understand deeply how the American people, after a decade of war, are not interested in any kind of military action that they don’t believe involves our direct national security interests. I– I get that. And members of Congress I think understand that. But in this situation where there’s clear evidence that nobody credible around the world disputes that chemical weapons were used, that over a thousand people were killed, that the way that these weapons were delivered makes it almost certain that Assad’s forces used them, when even Iran has acknowledged that chemical weapons were used inside of Syria.
In that situation, I think the issue is not the evidence — most people around the world are not questioning that chemical weapons were used. I think the question now is what– how does the– how does the international community respond. And I think it is important for us to run to ground every diplomatic channel that we can. There’s a reason why I went to Congress in part to allow further deliberation, not just here domestically but also internationally.
But I think it’s very important for us to make sure that we understand this is important. And if the American people– are not prepared to stand up for what is a really important international norm, then I think a lot of people around the world will take that signal — that this norm is not important.
Scott Pelley: The people aren’t with you.
President Obama: Yeah, well, not yet. And I, as I said, I understand that. So I’ll have a chance to talk to the American people directly tomorrow. I don’t expect that it’s gonna suddenly swing the polls wildly in the direction of another military engagement. If you ask the average person — including my household — “Do we need another military engagement?” I think the answer generally is gonna be no.
But what I’m gonna try to propose is, is that we have a very specific objective, a very narrow military option, and one that will not lead into some large-scale invasion of Syria or involvement or boots on the ground, nothing like that. This isn’t like Iraq, it’s not like Afghanistan, it’s not even like Libya. Then hopefully people will recognize why I think this is so important.
And that we should all be haunted by those images of those children that were killed. But more importantly, we should understand that when when we start saying it’s okay to — or at least that there’s no response to the gassing of children, that’s the kind of slippery slope that leads eventually to these chemical weapons being used more broadly around the world. That’s not the kind of world that we want to leave to our children.
The Senate Conservatives Fund have put a new ad that goes after Senator Mitch McConnell because he doesn’t push to defund Obamacare. “McConnell’s the Senate Republican leader, but he refuses to lead on defunding Obamacare,” the ad says. “What good is a leader like that?”
Less than a week ago President Obama was calling for a strike on Syria because they posed a “serious threat to our national security,” but last night he told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer that Syria, “doesn’t have a credible means to threaten the United States.” I guess if you are ok with the Boston Marathon style of attacks, then they pose no real threat.
President Obama: You know, what I’m thinking about is right now, though, how do we make sure we can verify that we do not have chemical weapons that can be used not only inside of Syria, but could potentially drift outside of Syria.
Wolf Blitzer: He said in an interview with Charlie Rose, that if you, the U.S. attack, launch military strikes, he said he will respond — anything, he said expect anything, not only from him, but from his allies. That sounds like a threat to the United States.
President Obama: Yeah. Mr. Assad doesn’t have a lot of capability. He has capability relative to children, he has capability relative to a — an opposition that is still getting itself organized, and are not professionally trained fighters. He doesn’t have a credible means to threaten the United States. His allies, Iran and Hezbollah, could potentially engage in asymmetrical strikes against us, but frankly the kinds of threats they could pose against us are typical of the kinds of threats we are dealing with around the world which I have spoken of recently, which is embassies that are being threatened, U.S. personnel in the region. Those are threats that we deal with on an ongoing basis, they are always of concern. Obviously we saw the situation in Yemen just a few weeks ago, where we wanted to respond by getting some of our folks out of there, but the notion that Mr. Assad could significantly threaten the United States is just not the case.
Secretary John Kerry is now calling for just a little bit of effort in Syria in response to the use of chemical weapons. In response to a question at a presser Kerry said, “I believe that the aftermath of the Iraq experience and Afghanistan leave a lot of people saying, “We don’t want to see our young people coming back in a body bag,” and so forth. But that’s not what we’re talking about. And what we have to do is make clear to people that this is – we’re not talking about war. We’re not going to war. We will not have people at risk in that way. We will be able to hold Bashar Assad accountable without engaging in troops on the ground or any other prolonged kind of effort in a very limited, very targeted, very short-term effort that degrades his capacity to deliver chemical weapons without assuming responsibility for Syria’s civil war. That is exactly what we’re talking about doing – unbelievably small, limited kind of effort.”